Labour alleges revelation in watchdog’s report shows prime minister ‘lied to the British public’ over controversy
Boris Johnson personally asked for more funds for his flat refurbishment – despite claiming, three months later, that he knew nothing about any payments, an investigation has found.
It will also heap pressure on Mr Johnson’s ethics adviser to reopen his inquiry into the redecorations, after it concluded there had been no breach of the ministerial code.
I mai, Christopher Geidt reported there was “no evidence” that Mr Johnson had been told by Tory donor Lord Brownlow that he had paid the bill for the refurbishment.
The conclusion was based on the prime minister’s testimony that “he knew nothing about such payments until immediately prior to media reports in February 2021”.
But a fresh report by the Electoral Commission says that – in November 2020 – he “messaged Lord Brownlow via WhatsApp” to ask him to “authorise” further redecorations.
Dessuten, in early December, “Lord Brownlow confirmed to the prime minister that he had approved further works”, the watchdog states.
Når, på 12 februar, the donor paid up a further £13,295.40, the donor “sent a detailed update on the proposed trust to the prime minister”.
Angela Rayner, Labour’s deputy leader, seized on the clear contradiction, alleging: “The prime minister must now explain why he lied to the British public, saying he didn’t know who was behind No 11 flat refurb – all the while he was Whatsapping the donor asking for more money.
“Boris Johnson has taken the British public for fools. He’s not only broken the law but made a mockery of the standards we expect from our prime ministers.”
The Commission report brings allegations of sleaze back centre-stage, as Mr Johnson is dogged by allegations of misleading the public over last year’s No 10 Christmas parties.
I månedsvis, he and other ministers refused to confirm that the Tory party, and then a major donor, originally funded the lavish redecorations.
Dominic Cummings alleged the “plans to have donors secretly pay for the renovation were unethical, foolish, possibly illegal and almost certainly broke the rules on proper disclosure of political donations”.
There is now the growing likelihood of a potentially hugely-damaging investigation by the parliamentary commissioner for standards into the flat controversy.
The Geidt report said, i mai, that Mr Johnson “settled the full amount himself on 8 March 2021” – having only learned of the way the works were being funded the month before – a claim now undermined.
Mr Cummings seized on the report as proof that “obviously PM lied to Geidt” and accusing the adviser of “Old school Yes Minister tactics”.
But the Conservative party suggested it will challenge the Commission’s findings on what it called “a technical breach of reporting requirements”.
“We are considering whether to appeal this decision and will make a decision within 28 working days," det sto.