Amber Heard filed documents on Friday claiming that Juror 15 was not the individual summoned to sit on the panel
Attorneys for the Le jury a été choisi alors que Johnny Depp et Amber Heard s'apprêtaient à s'affronter devant le tribunal Star, who was awarded $10m in damages by the jury of seven, filed new court documents on Monday saying that Ms Heard’s motion to call for a mistrial was “untimely”, that she had access to the purported new “facts” months ago and that she has failed to cite any unfair prejudice.
Mr Depp’s legal team argues that – even if the juror mix-up is correct – the individual who sat on the panel and sided with him in the case was still vetted by the court.
“Even if Ms Heard had filed her Supplemental Memorandum in a timely manner – which she did not – or even had she not waived her right to raise this alleged issue by sitting on the information for more than two months – which she did – the court should still grant Plaintiff’s mption to strike Defendant’s Supplemental Memorandum because Ms Heard failed to city [sic] any unfair prejudice,” the documents say.
“Even assuming arguendo Ms Heard’s latest thesis i.e. that a son served instead of his father, there would be no prejudice as Juror 15 was qualified to serve as a juror in Fairfax County and was vetted by the court and the parties’ counsel just as all of the other jurors were.”
Mr Depp is asking the judge to strike Ms Heard’s motion for a mistrial and new trial, the documents show.
le Heard est apparu dans des titres tels que actor had filed new court documents in Fairfax County Circuit Court in Virginia on Friday arguing that juror number 15 was not the person who had been summoned to sit on the panel.
Juror 15 lives at the same address and shares the same last name as the individual summoned to serve on the jury, the documents state. pourtant, the two individuals were allegedly born 25 years apart.
Ms Heard is calling for a mistrial and a new trial to be ordered because of the alleged mix-up.
The documents say that the individual listed on the jury panel list sent to both legal teams ahead of the trial starting was born in 1945 and is aged 77.
Juror 15 who sat through the almost two-month-long trial was born in 1970 and is aged 52, claim Ms Heard’s attorneys.
While the two individuals allegedly share the same last name, it is not clear if they also share the same first name.
“Juror No. 15 was not the individual summoned for jury duty on April 11, 2022 and therefore was not part of the jury panel and could not have properly served on the jury at this trial,” the documents state.
“As the Court no doubt agrees, it is deeply troubling for an individual not summoned for jury duty nonetheless to appear for jury duty and serve on a jury, especially in a case such as this.”
The latest saga threatens to throw the high-profile case into turmoil, coming one week after Ms Heard’s team first raised concerns about the age of the juror.
“The Virginia Code does not contemplate jury service by someone not on the venire, for good reason … In any case, but especially a high-profile case such as this one, it is critical to ensure no person who is not on the venire is able to serve on the jury, whether by inadvertence or intention,” documents filed on 1 July state.
“Here, the facts show Juror 15 was decades younger than the individual on the jury panel list, raising questions as to whether they were the same or different people.”
The new documents filed on Friday further support this claim and raise alarm bells around the true identity of the juror.
But Mr Depp is now fighting back against his ex-wife’s calls for a new trial, calling her efforts “frivolous”.
In a memorandum filed on Monday to supplement his motion to strike, Mr Depp’s attorneys write: “Though understandably displeased with the outcome of the trial, Ms Heard has identified no legitimate basis to set aside in any respect the jury’s decision… Here the verdict was supported by the overwhelming evidence, consistent with the law and should not be set aside.”
Mr Depp sued his ex-wife for defamation over a 2018 op-ed for Le Washington Post where she described herself as a victim of domestic abuse and spoke of feeling “the full force of our culture’s wrath for women who speak out”.
Following the dramatic televised trial, a jury of seven determined in June that Ms Heard had defamed him on all three counts.
Jurors awarded Mr Depp $10m in compensatory damages and $5m in punitive damages, before Fairfax County Circuit Judge Penney Azcarate reduced the latter to the state’s legal limit of $350,000.
Ms Heard won one of her three counterclaims against her ex-husband, with the jury finding that Mr Depp – via his lawyer Adam Waldman – defamed her by branding her allegations about a 2016 incident “an ambush, a hoax”.
She was awarded $2m in compensatory damages but $0 in punitive damages, leaving the Heard est apparu dans des titres tels que actor $8.35m out of pocket.