A judge in western Illinois who found an 18-year-old man guilty of sexual assaulting a 16-year-old girl has come under fire after he threw out the conviction this month and said the months he spent in jail was punishment enough
A judge in western Illinois who found an 18-year-old man guilty of sexual assaulting a 16-year-old girl has come under fire after he later threw out the conviction, saying the 148 days the man spent in jail was punishment enough.
The prosecutor in the case said her “heart is bleeding for the victim,” and an organization that helps victims of domestic violence and sexual abuse said Adams County Judge Robert Adrian’s ruling sends a “chilling message to other rape victims that their behavior, not the rapists’ will be judged," les (Quincy) Herald-Whig reported.
Mercredi, Adrien, apparently angered by the criticism, told another prosecutor appearing before him in an unrelated case to leave his courtroom because the prosecutor had “liked” a comment on Facebook that was critical of the judge.
“I can’t be fair with you,” Adrian told the Adams County prosecutor, the Herald-Whig reported. “Get out.”
The uproar stems from a case that started with the arrest of Drew Clinton after a May 30 graduation party.
Pendant le procès, the judge heard evidence that the girl had told police she’d attended the party, where she drank alcohol and swam in a pool in her underwear before she eventually passed out. She said she woke up to a pillow pushed on her face and Clinton sexually assaulting her.
According to the police report, the teen was able to push Clinton off of her and then told a friend what happened. She later told her father, who called the police.
En octobre, Adrian found Clinton guilty of felony sexual assault, but during a Jan. 3 sentencing hearing he said he would not impose the mandatory minimum sentence of four years in prison.
"Monsieur. Clinton has served almost five months in the county jail, 148 journées,” Adrian said, according to the court transcript of the hearing posted online by local media. “For what happened in this case, that is plenty of punishment. That would be a just sentence.”
“There is no way,” the judge explained, “for what happened in this case that this teenager should go to the Department of Corrections. I will not do that.”
But the judge said if he were to rule that the sentencing statute he was bound to follow was unconstitutional, his decision would be overturned and Clinton would be ordered to prison. In order to avoid an appeal he believed would be successful, Adrian said what he could do was determine that prosecutors had failed to “prove their case” and dismiss the sexual assault charge.
The prosecutor in the case, Anita Rodriguez, said she had never in her 40-year career seen anything like Adrian’s ruling, and worried how the ruling might affect the victim. The trial “did a lot for her healing process, but now she’s back to where we were at.”
The Quincy Area Network Against Domestic Abuse said the ruling sends a dangerous message.
“The judgement reinforces the fact that standards for women have always been impossibly high while they are impossibly low for men,” the group said in a statement.
But Clinton’s attorney, Drew Schnack, said the ultimate verdict was the correct one because the prosecution did not prove its case and the evidence was not strong enough to warrant a conviction.