The Arizona Senate has voted to open an ethics investigation into a firebrand Republican member who tweeted inflammatory comments about last weekend’s racist attack at a Buffalo, 纽约, supermarket
这 亚利桑那 Senate on Monday opened an ethics investigation into a firebrand 共和党人 member who tweeted inflammatory comments about last weekend’s racist attack at a 水牛, 纽约, supermarket that left 10 people dead.
The referral of GOP Sen. Wendy Rogers of Flagstaff to the Ethics Committee was in lieu of the immediate expulsion that Democratic lawmakers were planning, GOP Majority Leader Rick Gray said. Due process considerations require no less than an ethics investigation, 他说.
但 Democrats were furious, noting that Rogers was just censured in March for a repeated series of tweets and statements that embraced white nationalism and called for violence.
Despite a bipartisan 24-3 vote on the Republican plan to open an ethics committee review that could lead to an expulsion, censure or reprimand, Democrats failed to get any Republicans to back their motion to expel Rogers.
On Saturday, as news of the mass shooting by a white suspect who had posted a racist screed on the internet and driven about 200 英里 (322 公里) to a Black neighborhood in Buffalo, Rogers tweeted “Fed boy summer has started in Buffalo.”
Many in both parties took that tweet to mean that Rogers was blaming the attack on the federal government, especially in light of Rogers’ history of embracing conspiracy theories and posting of racist tropes.
Only three members voted not to open the ethics probe, including Rogers and Republican Sen. Warren Petersen, who said he hadn’t even heard of the controversy when he walked onto the Senate floor. Republican Sen. Kelly Townsend, who is challenging Rogers in the GOP primary after redistricting put both in the same district, also opposed the ethics probe.
Townsend said Rogers’ comments were an embarrassment to the state and the Republican Party and added to the pain that the families of those killed in Buffalo.
“But she has a right to make them,” Townsend said. “I have to defend a person’s right to say ugly things. That’s why the First Amendment exists. It doesn’t exist for the kind words — it exists for the ugly words.”
The hours-long debate in the Senate over what to do about Rogers devolved into a fracas, with Republicans accusing Democrats of trying to make political hay and Democrats accusing GOP members of a pattern of dodging uncomfortable discussions about race relations by shutting down any debate on the issue.
Republican Sen. Sonny Borrelli called it an example of cancel culture from Democrats who dislike Rogers and her brand of politics. Others agreed that Rogers’ words were being used against her.
“This is not an expellable offense,” Republican Sen. Michelle Ugenti-Rita said. “The Ds are politicizing it.”
She called it a dangerous precedent to consider expelling or even censuring a member for their tweets or comments.
GOP Sen. J.D. Mesnard, who was House speaker when a member was expelled in 2018 after a series of sexual misconduct allegations, said hearings and an ethics committee process were imperative.
“This is the equivalent of a legislative execution,” Mesnard said of the motion to expel Rogers. “That’s why due process and an ethics process and investigation is so critical.”
Democrats pointed to Rogers’ previous problems, which started the month she was sworn into office in 2021 when a staffer accused her of bullying and other unprofessional conduct, and the March 2022 censure, which also was approved by a 24-3 vote with three members not present. Townsend was absent, but said she would have voted yes.
“How many times do you allow your children to get out of hand before you provide the opportunity for discipline,” Democratic Sen. Theresa Hatathlie said. “Discipline is a teaching moment. That is something we have already had.”
Democratic Sen. Martin Quezada said much the same, and accused GOP members of “kicking the can down the road,” by not taking immediate action.
He said Rogers’ tweets needed no investigation, and those and her history were all that was in play.
“Now there’s a track record, now there’s a pattern of behavior,” Quezada said. “We haven’t heard any effort to defend those actions. And my assumption is because there is no defense to those actions.”
Rogers made no comment on the floor of the Senate where the other members spent hours discussing her.
Monday morning, 尽管, she tweeted that she “of course” condemned the violence in Buffalo.
“I also condemn the #FakeNews and the government promoting violence and then blaming it on regular patriotic Americans as if regular Americans share those despicable views. Everything is not what it seems!” the tweet continued.