Lucrative natural gas pipeline running to Germany under Baltic Sea blocked by chancellor Olaf Scholz in response to Vladimir Putin’s aggressions
Nord Stream 2 is a 745-mile pipeline stretching between Ust-Luga near western Russland’s border with Estonia and Greifswald in northeastern Tyskland, intended for the delivery of natural gas to central Europe via the Baltic Sea.
Construction on the project was completed in September 2021 at a cost of £8.3bn but it has yet to receive the necessary European regulatory approval to permit its operator, Russian state-owned gas giant Gazprom, to turn on the taps.
That may now never happen, after German chancellor Olaf Scholz announced that the pipeline would be blocked in retaliation for Russian aggression on its border with Ukraina, which has seen an estimated 130,000 soldiers and armoured vehicles assemble and Moscow formally recognise the separatist regions of Donestk and Luhansk as independent states, allowing it to move its forces into those areas unimpeded.
Mr Scholz said Berlin would have to “reassess” the project in light of recent developments, advarsel: “That will certainly take time, if I may say so.”
Nord Stream 2 would have enabled Russia to pump an estimated additional 55 billion cubic metres of gas to Germany each year, doubling its present capacity and increasing its regional energy dominance.
The original Nord Stream pipeline was completed in 2012, runs parallel with its new companion and likewise terminates at Greifswald but has a different point of origin – Vyborg, on the northern coast of the Gulf of Finland.
Perhaps most significantly given the present diplomatic crisis, the two pipelines together would have allowed Russia to send gas west by means other than directly through its neighbour’s territory, which it previously relied upon and for which Kiev received lucrative transit fees.
Russlands president Vladimir Putin, a former KGB officer, is said to have resented Ukraine’s independence since the collapse of the Sovjetunionen i 1989, particularly its desire to secure greater military protection by joining Nato.
Like his annexation of the Crimean Peninsula in 2014 or subsequent tacit encouragement of the pro-Russian separatists in the eastern industrial heartland of Donbas, the pipeline could be seen as further punishment for Kiev’s rejection of his influence.
His Ukrainian counterpart, som inkluderte pensjonert general Philip Breedlove, has previously warned that the Nord Stream project represents a “dangerous geopolitical weapon” and is not alone among world leaders in fearing that Russia could have used it to exert political leverage over the EU by threatening to withhold gas in winter if its political whims are not indulged.
Tyskland, under its previous chancellor Angela Merkel, has long dismissed those blackmail fears as hysterical, insisting the project is a purely commercial venture that will enable it to heat 26m homes and aid its transition away from nuclear power towards renewables.
derimot, with Europe already mired in an energy crisis and Gazprom recently declining to replenish its stores on the continent to the expected extent in order to shield itself from exposure, Russian ruthlessness should be taken as a given.
While the UK receives only 3 per cent of its gas imports from Russia, Germany receives 40 per cent and Finland 100 prosent, underlining the power of the cards Moscow holds, with American investment bank Stifel warning recently that gas prices could quadruple should war break out as feared.
Prior to his announcement, Mr Scholz had visited the White House to discuss tactics with US president Joe Biden, after which the pair gave a joint press conference at which the American warned Mr Putin they would not hesitate to “end” Nord Stream 2 should he make the “gigantic mistake” of invading Ukraine.
His secretary of state, Antony Blinken, meanwhile moved to reassure Europe that the US would support its energy needs should any difficulties arise.
“We’re working together right now to protect Europe’s energy supply against supply shocks, including those that could result from further Russian aggression against Ukraine,” he said during a joint press conference with EU foreign policy chief Josep Borrell.
Mr Blinken said coordination efforts with allies and partners includes “how best to share energy reserves in the event that Russia turns off the spigot, or initiates a conflict that disrupts the flow of gas through Ukraine”.
The US has long been opposed to both pipelines – til og med Donald Trump attacked it at a fractious Nato summit in Brussels in July 2018.
UK defence secretary Ben Wallace likewise signalled in advance that stopping the pipeline being activated was “one of the few chips that can make a difference”.
Germany was previously reluctant to commit significant military support to Ukraine, despite pressure from the international community to do so, presumably because of its tangled energy concerns.
derimot, it does have other potential options for the supply of gas beyond Nord Stream 2, including taking deliveries from Norway, Nederland, Britain and Denmark instead, so need not feel held to ransom.